Bill Brady responding: A Culture is a Way of Life. Countries and Regions of The World have distinct Cultures. Cultures change over time. Every Group of believers has a distinct Culture. The Culture reflects the Journey of that Group of believers. It especially reflects the Blueprint seen by the Founding Father of the Group.
There is a Culture that is associated with each Spiritual Age. The Spiritual Age that a Group of Believers is functioning in is the primary thing that is reflected in the Culture of a Group of believers.
How does this relate to The Culture Chancellor House? The Culture Chancellor House functions in relationship to our Group / Bench / Family / Ecclesia.
I see 3 functions of any Name. We Journey through these same 3 functions with respect to any Name. The 3 Functions of a Name are: 1) We receive from a Name. 2) After we become the Name we impart from that Name. 3) Finally, we train others how to Receive and Impart from the Name.
Let’s look at The Culture Chancellor House with respect to these 3 Functions. The Culture Chancellor House functions with respect to Culture. Specifically, it functions in replacing an Old Culture with a New Culture. Here are the 3 Functions: 1) We go there to receive a new Culture for ourselves / our Group. 2) We sit there to give a new Culture to those who come for a New Culture. This is functioning as a Chancellor in this Chancellor House. 3) We function to train others to become a Chancellor in the House. This is functioning as a Chief Chancellor. These 3 Levels of Function can be summarized as 1) Visitor / Receiver, 2) Chancellor and 3) Chief Chancellor.
I can see where the Culture Chancellor House functions as a Bench of 12 to change the Culture of the Entire Universal Ecclesia. This shows us that individual Chancellors function in 2 functions. 1) As an individual Chancellor with respect to their own Group. 2) As a part of the Bench of 12 with respect to the Entire Universal Ecclesia.
This brings us to the question about how many Chancellors and Chief Chancellors are there in each Chancellor House? The traditional answer has been that there are 12 Chancellors and 1 Chief Chancellor in each Chancellor House. This means that each Chancellor House has a Bench of 12 and 1 Chief Chancellor.
We are now seeing that the 12 Chief Chancellors make up a Bench of 12 Chief Chancellors. We see that this is likely The Bench of 12 for The Universal Ecclesia.
The 12 Laws of Zion include this progression of 5 Names. These 5 Names are also the 5 Names of The Age of Melchizedek. The Age of Melchizedek follows The Kingdom Age. (Read up from the bottom.)

Sonship Kingship Sacrifice (The Living Sacrifice / Lamb of God part of Priesthood.) Legislation Oracle

With respect to Priesthood the highest form of Priesthood is High Priest. With respect to Kingship the highest form of Kingship is King of Kings. With respect to Chancellorship it is Chief Chancellor.

Yeshua is The King of Kings and The High Priest. Both according to The Order of Melchizedek. Is Yeshua also The Chief Chancellor? Is Chancellorship also according to The Order of Melchizedek? My preliminary answer is “Yes” to both of these questions.
We know that living believers function as Chief Chancellors. I also see that living believers function as High Priest and King of Kings. Each of these Names is the highest function in each of 3 Laws of Zion:
Chancellorship, Kingship and Sacrifice (Priesthood).

Here is a Question for Discovery: Are there only 12 Chancellors in each Chancellors House? Or is it that there are 12 seats for Chancellors in a Chancellor House and 12 Chancellors are needed to sit in those 12 seats in order for the Bench of 12 to Function as a Bench at any given moment? In this case there would be a Pool of Chancellors and 12 need to be present.
I wrote this functioning as an Oracle. I wrote with the confidence of an Oracle. However, it still needs to be ratified by the Ecclesia. We see in part and know in part. I was stretching to the limits of my faith speaking as an Oracle. I could have gotten part of the above wrong. There is great value in looking out to the limits of the distance that we are currently able to see in Discovery. It is worth taking the chance of seeing incorrectly in part. It is worth chancing this because the part that we do see correctly is of such great value.